Yes, kids use AI. What about teachers?


Who's teaching AI?

Back in March, I shared the results of a survey of middle and high school students about how they use AI in school. The bottom line: They pretty much all use AI, most of them are not using AI to plagiarize outright, and middle schoolers push the envelope with AI further than high school students.

But what about their teachers?

If Abbott Elementary can dedicate an entire episode to this, it's definitely worth a nerd processor case study!

Survey says: Bring on the AI

My student survey focused on people based in the greater Seattle area, and the teacher survey does too. In order to keep symmetry with the student survey, this case study includes responses from 100 middle school teachers and 100 high school teachers. They teach math, science, English, history, or foreign language.

Some of the same caveats from the student survey apply here. Seattle is a tech-forward market, so it's reasonable to assume that participants are on the farther edge of the AI adoption curve. That being said, while AI adoption in other regions may be lower, we can still learn something from the directional trends in this data.

tl;dr Teachers are using AI. A lot. 80% of respondents have used AI in their teacher jobs.

School AI policies: Pretty centrist

In the student survey, middle school students showed more progressive attitudes about AI than the high schoolers. Middle schoolers were more likely to disagree with their school AI policies, more likely to have used AI without their teachers knowing, and less likely to consider it cheating to use AI. Middle school and high school teachers showed no such differences.

Just over half of the teachers agree with their school's AI policies; the rest are split between thinking the policies are too permissive and too restrictive. In other words, schools have found a policy spot that is pretty centrist as far as teacher opinion goes.

I was interested to see that almost 70% of teachers encourage their students to use AI in at least some circumstances. It's worth calling out again that Seattle is a tech-forward market and I'd expect national (and international) numbers to be lower, but I found this really striking.

Teachers are not just specifying whether students can use AI on a particular assignment; 60% of them are providing structured guidance on where, when, and how AI should be used. I find this data point extremely encouraging. This shows remarkable ability on behalf of educators to adapt to a rapidly evolving technological landscape, and willingness to help students build the skills they will need down the road.

Teachers use AI. A lot.

The guidance that teachers provide their students about how and when to use AI may come from personal experience. 80% of the teachers have used AI in their teacher jobs at least a little, compared with 81% of the middle and high school students. I'd expected teacher adoption rates to be lower than student rates, but they look the same.

As for where teachers are using AI in their work, nearly half the teachers are using AI to get ideas for lesson plans, and almost a third are using AI to help write assignments.

I was surprised and a little disappointed to see that so many of the teachers are using AI to write student feedback. Granted, I am deeper in this topic than most, given that we built an entire AI product at Textio focused on writing fair workplace feedback. But the bias in using off-the-shelf AI like ChatGPT to write feedback is pervasive, and this use case poses real risks for equity in schools.

Our moment in the metaverse

I'm not sure that anything summarizes the current inflection point better than teachers using AI to check whether their students are using AI. This was the most common example that came up in the survey when teachers explained the types of plagiarism that they're using AI to uncover.

Using AI to spot AI is about the most meta thing ever, and that's our current moment.

What do you think?

Thanks for reading!

Kieran

p.s. I recently came across Emily Parkhurst's Formidable newsletter, and specifically this story about how women don't choose lower-wage jobs; wages drop when women enter an industry. This is exactly my kind of data story, so if you like nerd processor, you might like this too!

Catch up on nerd processor case studies | Subscribe | nerdprocessor.com

kieran@nerdprocessor.com
Unsubscribe · Preferences

nerd processor

Every week, I write a deep dive into some aspect of AI, startups, and teams. Enter your email address to subscribe below!

Read more from nerd processor

Buying robots from robots Last week I received the following obviously-ChatGPT-generated sales mail in my Textio inbox: What is the product? Who knows! As I've written recently, I'm currently receiving hundreds of identical-sounding sales mails every single week, most obviously written with ChatGPT or with tools that wrap ChatGPT pretty thinly. The majority of these messages are offering AI-powered sales and marketing tools. Oh, the irony. Here's what I'm wondering: Is anyone reading this...

Slack is no place for the Great American Novel(and it's terrible for that project update you just wrote too) The other day, someone asked me to read an important project update. I was interested in the project, but I kept putting it off. Every time I looked at it, a thousand words written in Slack chat, all in one paragraph, all in plain text, I felt overwhelmed. Not reading it in a timely way definitely made me worse at my job, but I just didn’t have the fortitude. Sending long status...

Selling AI sure is fun! Recently, I had a conversation with the founder of an AI startup who described an interesting dynamic: CEO of a traditional enterprise announces that every department should be modernizing operations with AI Every team rushes to investigate, including teams with limited tech expertise (think HR, finance, marketing, legal) Suddenly everyone wants to buy stuff, per the CEO mandate, so IT scrambles to assemble an AI review board, usually without experienced personnel...